miles 24-26.2i was able to pick up the pace to some degree on the downhill 24th mile, but not to the extent that i would have liked. not that i was looking at my pace chart much anymore... at this stage of the game, you do whatever the hell you can to get to the finish. by the time lexington parkway came around, it was time to climb again. i wasn't able to take to the gentle ascent as aggressively as the big hill at mile 21; the marathon was starting to feel like a marathon at this point, and i had dig down and push. i made myself a deal: if i suck it up for the next fifteen minutes and get to the finish, i'll never run again. i agreed to its terms, the spectators as my witnesses; east on summit we went.
as i crossed mile 25, i had to take a look at the overall time to see whereabouts i might be arriving. my elapsed time read 2:57:54--i was 8:22 away from my
2005 PR with 1.2 miles to go. "jesus, i could do this on fresh legs," i thought. "let's go; let's get this."
my form was breaking at this point. i don't know how smooth it looked to the spectators, but it sure didn't feel like floating anymore. my only respite was the sight of a cross on top of a steeple that peeked through the houses to the left. that respite was needed--my left shin muscle was cramping, which kept my foot pointed upward and prevented me from landing on it properly.
the past four miles on summit ave were a tunnel of residential houses and people on a heavily tree-lined street. when summit turns into john ireland boulevard, the tunnel abruptly ends--you're left with a panoramic view of st. paul proper. to the right, downtown st. paul. to the left,
the cathedral of st. paul, whose steeple i saw earlier. and straight ahead lay a 50 foot drop to the finish line in front of
the minnesota state capitol under a cloudless blue sky. it was a fabulous view.
the downhill relived the cramp, and i pushed as much as i could into the finish. with about 50m to go, i saw 3:06:16 tick away on my watch. honestly, i didn't really care.
this was my new PR, this was my day. i felt a great sense of relief crossing the finish line--my eighth marathon was in the books with a 3:06:28.
the finish line was well organized and easy to navigate. they had hot vegetable broth (genius yet again!), which i loved for its high salt content. i hobbled over to the massage tent; i was having some cramping issues that needed to be resolved. after about fifteen minutes in the tent, i was ready to go and face the day.
i hadn't realized that a full half-hour had passed from the time that i finished to the time that i called lars, which is why i was somewhat surprised to hear that lars and fisher were both in already. we met up in front of the capitol--lars finished in 3:17 and fisher finished in 3:32. lars's parents picked us up, and within an hour we were relaxing in the family hottub munching on some local pizza. alex came and joined us at the roe house that afternoon. we discover that no only did he run a debut 3:13, but he also scored digits from some gal at the finish line as well. ha!
in the afternoon, i had the pleasure of seeing the live television broadcast of the twins winning the central division title and joe mauer winning the AL batting title at the metrodome. and to think that i was just there this morning for the start of the marathon! i was a twins fan for sure, if but just for a day.
that night, we had a party at lars's townhouse, where fisher and i met plenty of his friends along with some other folks who ran the marathon as well. lars was in fine form (to no one's surprise); fisher tried to get some sembalance of sleep so that he could catch his 5:30am flight the next morning.
postludethis may have been the best marathon experience i've ever had. the organization of the race, the course, the weather, having lars's parents around, and the luxury of having a house to wake up in/come back to... it was all just gangbusters. my only real complaint is that the published elevation map is deceiving--the course has more inclines (miles 14-20, 24-25) than the map leads to believe, and the hill published on mile 9 has several decents that make it faster than expected. fortunately i found all of this out the day before the race on our course tour, so i don't really have any personal beef.
as for the twelve seconds... i've given them a lot of thought over the past week, despite the difficulty of the course. at the finish line, i could have cared less about them, and that still holds true today. i've asked myself about the easy-paced mile 1, whether i could have taken 15 seconds off there. but as i look at
my actual versus target splits, i made up for the slow start on the very next mile (albeit unintentional). the only mile i didn't really hit was mile 24 (the one mile respite from all the climbing), but even that was offset by an unintentionally fast mile 9. in short, i planned my run, ran my plan and couldn't be any happier.
comparing my 3:06:28 run on sunday to my previous two PRs, i'm left to believe that although i ran the first 5k on sunday exactly at my planned pace, the planned pace itself was a touch conservative. it's interesting to note how delicate those first three miles are, especially when compared to my austin '99 run in the same graph... a real "butterfly flaps its wings" scenario if there was one. given the climbing at the end of TCM, i can't fault myself for being conservative in the first 5k. now that i know the course better, i'll take off 20 seconds in those first three miles next time. if anything, the TCM chart showed the least variance in pace throughout the middle 75% of the run, in contrast to the other two PRs; it makes me wonder what the hell i was doing back in '99. the comparison of mile 22 across the three marathons is also a real treat--mile 22 at TCM was a vertical wall in constrast to the two austin runs, and the fact that it is almost the fast of the three miles in that cross-section is a testament to how good i was feeling at that moment.
i spent the entire summer working on my speed. now it feels like it all went by way too fast. if anything, the twelve seconds serve as a reminder to that which is easily forgotten after marathons such as this:
there's more running out there.
the numbers3:06:28--7:07/mi, 239th overall, 46th 30-34 male.
1:34:00/1:32:28 split (7:11/7:04).
==============
807 0:08:07
708 0:15:15
733 0:24:48
704 0:29:52
707 0:36:59 (mile 5, 7:24/mi cumulative pace)
709 0:44:08
709 0:51:17
707 0:58:23
659 1:05:22
657 1:12:19 (10, 7:14)
653 1:19:11
708 1:26:20
654 1:33:14
700 1:40:14
658 1:47:12 (15, 7:09)
651 1:54:03
649 2:00:52
654 2:07:46
649 2:14:35
656 2:21:31 (20, 7:05)
659 2:28:31
716 2:35:47
731 2:43:18
715 2:50:33
721 2:57:54 (25, 7:07)
707 3:05:01
128 3:06:28 (26.2, 7:07)